Talk:160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment (Airborne)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment (Airborne) article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related task forces (nations and regions): United States military history task force

Contents 1 NPOV dispute 2 Regarding 160th SOAR Helicopters 3 References 4 Night vision equipment

[edit] NPOV dispute

Moved to: Talk:160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment/NPOV disputes

Please use the above page for further and future discussion regarding NPOV disputes of this article.

---

[edit] Regarding 160th SOAR Helicopters

Please, do not change the links to where the helicopters point to.

• The UH-60 Black Hawk and the MH-60 Black Hawk are DIFFERENT helicopters. [1]
• The CH-47 Chinook and MH-47 Chinook are DIFFERENT helicopters. [2]

I will be copy/pasting the information from the 160th SOAR USASOC website about the helicopters used by the unit. On the meanwhile, please leave the wiki links as they are.

--Maio 03:48, 10 Jan 2004 (UTC)

"The UH-60 Black Hawk and the MH-60 Black Hawk are DIFFERENT helicopters."

Kind of depends on your point of view. You could easily say they were different variants of the same helicopter - for example the airframes are the same, the engines are the same, the performance is pretty much the same; the only things different are the equipment specification. I changed the links from red ones to blue ones. Feel free to change them back when there is an actual MH-60 link. Incidentally, the page on 3rd battalion says half its MH-60s are "configured as AH-60". See GlobalSecurity.org, which consider all *H-60s to be 'variants'. DJ Clayworth 16:06, 12 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the references. I beleive the best way would be to create an article named "H-60 Black Hawk helicopter" where we describe and give a picture of all the variants of the helicopter model. That way we avoid visitors' confussion and eliminate future issues regarding wikifies; as we will redirect all helicopter variations to that article. What do you think of this? --Maio 00:55, Jan 13, 2004 (UTC)

That's an excellent idea. We can put the generic info in there, and details of the variants in individual articles. In fact I think we should suggest this as the standard approach. For less popular helicopters we can have one article for the generic copter, and add articles oneach variant as required. Thanks for the suggestion. DJ Clayworth 15:29, 13 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Aight, I'm gonna start editing the article on Talk:Black Hawk helicopter/Sandbox to avoid vandalizing the current article. If you could work with me, that would be awesome. --Maio 12:19, Jan 14, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] References

Removed References section; its three listings duplicated three things that appeared above it in the text. I've pasted the removed section below Bbpen 05:05, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)

References

1. 160th SOAR (A) fact sheet, 2003. U.S. Army 101st Airborne Division, Fort Campbell, Ky.
2. 160th SOAR (A) fact sheet, 2003. U.S. Special Operations Command, Fort Bragg, N.C.
3. Image, The crew of Super 64 a month before the battle of Mogadishu, September 1993, by Phil Lepre. U.S. Army Rangers.

[edit] Night vision equipment

The article makes mention of the Nightstlakers being the first to use nightvision equipment in night combat operations in 1987. I'm wondering about the validity of this considering British helicopter pilots were reported as using Night vision goggles in the Falklands war when flying SAS/SBS/Commando units into their operating areas. TasDave 08:11, 8 April 2007 (UTC)