User talk:3p1416
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, 3p1416, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
Hi, 3p1416. This is 2e7183 (just kidding ...)
Seriously, I ran across your new article Control of chaos, and noticed a red link for your talk page. So I just stopped by to say hello. Here's another page you might want to visit from time to time. A bunch of the mathematicians on Wikipedia get together there to kick things around.
Have a great day! DavidCBryant 13:10, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Control of Chaos
Hello! It's me again.
Say, I just edited Control of chaos. You might want to look it over to be sure you approve of my edits. I did want to point one thing out, which might not be obvious. You had coded a category tag as "Category:Chaos theory|*". I changed that to "Category:Chaos theory". The little "|*" bit identifies the article in which it's found as the primary article for that category. I think Chaos theory should be the main article for "Category:Chaos theory", and your new article should appear as a sub-heading within the category. DavidCBryant 14:09, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you and UPOs
Hello David,
Thanks a lot for your warmth welcome, for your help, and for your advice that will be taken into account. As you will notice, I reversed only one of the changes that you did to “Control of Chaos”: the skeleton of a chaotic attractor is made of truly periodic orbits. Although unstable, these orbits are properly periodic. They are not more or less periodic as “almost-periodic” suggests. Anyway, I feel that the remainder of your editing has improved the article. Thank you again. 3p1416 11:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
