Talk:70 mm film
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Changes
I've just done a quick clean up job for this article, I'm going to continue working on it in the coming days. My main problems concern the second portion of the article and how to organize those contents. --Allseeingi 16:54, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
- Just be careful about your pruning. I fear that your current changes have already deleted reference as to the technical superiorities the format has over 35mm as well as the cultural status it held. It's not POV if it's objective, remember. Girolamo Savonarola 23:42, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
- I've added more to the history section. I'm unsure about how to expand information about the cultural status of the stock. Do you think a new section should be added? --Allseeingi 21:21, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- Well, there are many sites devoted to the 70mm format and what it used to mean to see a film like that. I dunno, I mean, if you're not feeling it yourself, don't force it. Girolamo Savonarola 22:56, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- I think the section on 65mm/70mm films should be moved to its own article. That would unclutter this page and make it easier to navigate. --Allseeingi 20:45, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- Well, there are many sites devoted to the 70mm format and what it used to mean to see a film like that. I dunno, I mean, if you're not feeling it yourself, don't force it. Girolamo Savonarola 22:56, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- I've added more to the history section. I'm unsure about how to expand information about the cultural status of the stock. Do you think a new section should be added? --Allseeingi 21:21, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Update: I've added those films to their own page. List_of_70mm_Films--Allseeingi 20:49, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- I've created sections for the various uses of 70mm film and I've a lot of information from the history section to their appropriate sections. With these changes and a few more, I think this article can soon lose the clean up tag. --Allseeingi 20:20, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Very good article. I just miss numbers of the costs.