From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49b94/49b94644ae99bef8379b9def96dbe35cced28aa8" alt="" |
CheckUser evidence has determined that this IP address has been used abusively;
the address has been blocked temporarily or permanently to prevent further abuse.
If you are a registered user and are seeing this message, please post {{unblock}} on your talk page, with a note
referencing this message. Please be sure to include the IP address (which should appear at the bottom of the block message).
Administrators should not undo any block that is specifically called a "Checkuser" block. Period. The Checkuser knows something that you don't. If the unblock template goes up you need to ask the Checkuser why the block is there. The Checkuser might not tell you, but they will review the situation and decide whether the block can be lifted. It may not be obvious why that block is in place, but there is a reason.[1]
(see: block log • current autoblocks)
|
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "This is definitely NOT open-proxy, but shared IP. Read about NAT. Unblock it ASAP, please. Thanks."
Decline reason: "Looks like it is to me. You'll have to contact your ISP. —Pilotguy go around 19:16, 3 March 2007 (UTC)"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "How did you check it? AFAIK it is NOT open-proxy. If you claim otherwise, prove it somehow."
Decline reason: "To say the least, your IP shows up on 4 real-time blacklists (see "Multi-RBL" list, above). Jpgordon, the administrator who blocked you, is a checkuser and well aware of how to check for open proxies. Sorry, but it looks like you'll need to use another web connection. – Luna Santin (talk) 21:23, 3 March 2007 (UTC)"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "I'm sorry, but he is simply wrong. This IP is NOT open-proxy. Multi-RBL lists also open relays, but open relays are not the same thing as open-proxy. BTW - jpgordon is not present in this list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_on_open_proxies/verified_users (nor you are)."
Decline reason: "It's a proxy. Complain to your ISP about it, not us. —Pilotguy go around 23:16, 3 March 2007 (UTC)"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "No, it is NOT open-proxy. Could you ask someone more experienced (someone from this list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_on_open_proxies/verified_users ) to review this block? Thanks."
Decline reason: "reason — Cbrown1023 talk 02:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
Unblocked
Per a request on meta, I've rechecked this ip, and it appears to me to be quite secure. It has four red listings on Multi-RBL, including a SORBS listing; however, all listings are for spam concerns, not for being a zombie or an OP. In any case, I do believe this proxy was once open, but is not any more. For this reason, I'm going to unblock--if anyone objects, please feel free to reblock; however, please kindly let me know. Below are the nmap results on this ip as of 9 March 07:
amidaniel@VOYAGER:~> nmap -vP0 83.238.180.4
Starting Nmap 4.00 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2007-03-09 01:31 MST
DNS resolution of 1 IPs took 0.34s. Mode: Async [#: 2, OK: 1, NX: 0, DR: 0, SF: 0, TR: 1, CN: 0]
Initiating Connect() Scan against ip-83-238-180-4.netia.com.pl (83.238.180.4) [1672 ports] at 01:31
Connect() Scan Timing: About 8.97% done; ETC: 01:37 (0:05:05 remaining)
Stats: 0:05:10 elapsed; 1 hosts completed (1 up), 1 undergoing Connect() Scan
Connect() Scan Timing: About 89.44% done; ETC: 01:37 (0:00:36 remaining)
The Connect() Scan took 366.23s to scan 1672 total ports.
Host ip-83-238-180-4.netia.com.pl (83.238.180.4) appears to be up ... good.
All 1672 scanned ports on ip-83-238-180-4.netia.com.pl (83.238.180.4) are: filtered
Nmap finished: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 366.603 seconds
-- AmiDaniel (talk) 08:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for unblock
Thank you for checking this IP and confirming that it is not open-proxy. BTW - you've written: I do believe this proxy was once open,(...) -- just for the record - I want to say that I checked this IP in similar manner from external host and I got similar results - i.e. not open-proxy - IN A DAY OF BLOCK. So I believe this block was unfounded from the beginning. Anyway, thanks again for unblocking and have a nice vacation. 83.238.180.4 16:58, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
| This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address.
[IP info · Traceroute · WHOIS · Abuse · City · RDNS] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]
|