User talk:Aditya Kabir/Sandbox
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Do not use as a talk page.
- Conflicting Wikipedia philosophies
- {{context}}
- http://dhakadailyphoto.blogspot.com/2006_11_01_dhakadailyphoto_archive.html
- http://bdshots.com/v/Bangladesh/
- http://dhaka-pic.blogspot.com/search/label/Bangladesh%20Pictures
- Bakaman in trouble
- Wikipedia:WikiProject London
- Tottenham
- Template:Indian selected
Contents |
[edit] Reference collection
[edit] POVpointers
- A vital component: good research
- But, no original research, please: Original research excludes editors' personal views, political opinions, and any personal analysis or synthesis of published material that appears to advance a position the editor may hold. That is, any facts, opinions, interpretations, definitions, and arguments published by Wikipedia must already have been published by a reliable publication in relation to the topic of the article. See this example for more details. (See: WP:NOR)
- Let the facts speak for themselves
- Be careful not to err too far on the side of not upsetting editors by leaving unsourced information in articles for too long, or at all in the case of information about living people. Jimmy Wales has said of this: "I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons." (See: WP:VERIFY)
- Attributing and substantiating biased statements
- Think ahead. Try to imagine whether or not people might doubt what you wrote, or need more information about it. Supporting what is written in Wikipedia by referring to a clear and reliable source will add stability to your contribution. (See: WP:CITE)
[edit] Unislander
- It was one of the 11 universities that went operational without University Grants Commission (UGC) approval which was made a necessity under the Private University Act (1992) in Bangladesh. [1]
- It also was one of the 27 private universities in Bangladesh running without a Vice-Chancellor. [2]
- And, it was one of the 10 univerisities that the UGC issued a deadline of one year to improve qualities.[3]
- It also introduced new academic courses without UGC approval along with a number of other private universities. [4]
- It was one of the eight universities the University Grants Commission of Bangladesh recommended for shutting down due to poor quality of academic standards.[5]
- The university was also served with show-cause notice by judicial authorities asking why it would not be closed down.[6]
- The university was found to unauthorized courses and illegal campuses.[7]
[edit] Results
- ^ Khan, Siddiqur Rahman. "11 pvt univs offer 50 courses without UGC approval", New Age, 2005-01-18. Retrieved on December 16, 2006. (in English)
- ^ Varsity Correspondent. "27 private varsities running without Vice-Chancellors", The Bangladesh Observer, 2004-08-16. Retrieved on December 16, 2006. (in English)
- ^ Staff Reporter. "UCG report on private varsities to be made public", The Independent, 2004-10-23. Retrieved on December 16, 2006. (in English)
- ^ Staff Correspondent. "Private universities continue to hoodwink UGC", Weekly Holiday, 2004-06-02. Retrieved on December 16, 2006. (in English)
- ^ Ali, Tawfique. "40-45 varsities way behind prerequisites", The Daily Star, 2004-10-19. Retrieved on March 17, 2007. (in English)
- ^ Khan, Siddiqur Rahman. "Ministry serves notice on six private universities", New Age, 2005-03-01. Retrieved on March 17, 2007. (in English)
- ^ Hammadi, Saad. "Illegal courses, mysterious outer campuses dodge universities watchdog", New Age, 2006-06-02. Retrieved on March 17, 2007. (in English)
[edit] Icon collection
Wikimedia Commons has media related to:
Wikimedia Commons has media related to:
Wikimedia Commons has media related to:
Wikimedia Commons has media related to:
|