Talk:Aes Dana (band)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Disambiguation
I think that Aes Dana and Aes Dana should be placed on a disambiguation page. --Arash Keshmirian 05:45, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
-
- I agree, how should this be done? Aes Dana (Metal) and Aes Dana (Ambient)? Protiek 20:18, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
- Done today (to do this, I first had to move the page to another name, a "Aes Dana (disambiguation)" page was created automatically, and Aes Dana directly linked to the band, then I remove the comment on the trance group, and created a stub page about them - Hervegirod 15:58, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fixed Redirecting Issues
I was not happy with the way that Aes Dana directly linked here when there was a disambiguation page for "Aes Dana". I saw no reason for this other than to imply that Aes Dana (band) as a subject is more important than Aes Dana the ambient trance artist, or any of the other articles of the same name. Regardless, I've removed the redirection, and changed it so that "Aes Dana" redirects to the disambiguation page, and not this page. This means that users can have a choice which page they arrive on first, rather than being forced to visit this article, regardless of whether they want to or not. Please in future remember that when you are creating a disambiguation page for a number of articles that share the same name, you must make sure that it redirects to the disambiguation page - no article deserves more attention than any other. --Badharlick 17:07, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
At first, the two group were on the same page, I just separated them, but I didn't know how to create a specific "disambiguation" page yet. Plus, there was a lot more on Aes Dana (metal group) than Aes Dana (ambiant trance artist) in this page at the moment. Hervegirod 21:55, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] What does this article need to be promoted from stub-class ?
User:Kingboyk reverted this article to stub-class. I thought there was enough improvements in it to "promote it", apparently it was not the case. What does he still need for promotion ? Hervegirod 10:57, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- I reverted because you removed the WPBio tag wholesale. I didn't assess the article, just restored the tag. Still looks like a stub to me though - there's only 4 sentences of prose. --kingboyk 11:49, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- and now ? Hervegirod 12:13, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- I think there is enough information in this article to classify it as Start-class now. Hervegirod 12:45, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- and now ? Hervegirod 12:13, 15 October 2006 (UTC)