Talk:AlBaho Case
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Wikify!
|
|||
| Check if the article is a copyright violation or meets deletion criteria. | ✔ check | ||
| Suggestion: Do a quick Google or Yahoo! search with a sentence from the article. | |||
| Check if another article already exists on this subject. | ✔ check | ||
| Suggestion: Use the Wikipedia search to see what comes up. | |||
| Add Wikipedia markup. | (pending) | ||
| Suggestion: Read up on m:Help:Editing. | |||
| Format the article. | (pending) | ||
| Suggestion: Read up on Guide to Layout and Manual of Style. | |||
| Remove the {{wikify}} tag (if there is one). | (pending) | ||
| Join the Wikification effort! • How to use this template | |||
[edit] Page move?
The current title "AlBaho Case" seems unsatisfactory, since the phrase is almost unknown in English (see Google) and besides there's no reason to capitalise "Case" unless it's part of a well-known or official phrase. I think the article would be better placed under the name of the person involved, ie at Tareq AlBaho (which gets a wider range of hits). Before I make the move, any thoughts? Loganberry (Talk) 10:44, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Title and content
I agree with Loganberry in what he says about the title "AlBaho Case". But I am not so sure about the alternative he suggests: "Tareq AlBaho" - it sounds too personal; as if the story is about this person rather than the larger issues involved. What about "ESPCI email espionage case"? It is a bit long but perhaps more accurate, and with "case" not capitalised there is no claim to some wider fame.
[edit] Deletion
I have deleted the page because it cites no sources and the allegations would be libellous if untrue. Also, this material has been the subject of complaints to WP:OTRS. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 00:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
