Talk:Allegations of mass grave at Mirusuvil
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Neutrality discussion
from [1] I dont know whether it is in your line of Wiki duty to do neutrality sanity check. I saw you get involved a while ago on a Sri Lanka relatedd bio article om Kumar Ponnambalam. I cretead a new one called Mirusuvil mass grave. I need someone to do a neutrality sanity check before I categorize it and link it to other articles. Any directions will be appreciatedRaveenS 13:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- If I was you, I'd merge it with Mirusivil Massacre. I'm not sure we need two articles for this. yandman 13:53, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- OK good idea but how about the quality of the merged article itself from a neutrality point of view ?RaveenS 14:18, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Yeah, it looks reasonably neutral. yandman 14:36, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] Article is diputed
three reasons
- daily news article is a poem and certainly not about this incident.
- second source ,The British Refugee Council,is established the Sri Lanka Project in December 1987, on the request of international NGOs. SriLanka has several hundreds NGO and Anyone can start and run an NGO here..So this source fails WP:RS.
- Other disappearances section is written as a propaganda here..for further details please look at the chemmani article and its talk page.thanks--Iwazaki 02:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- found two more reasons
- tamil net is extremely pro LTTE and anything written there can be safely put in to the garbage bin
- BBC link does not work
thanks--Iwazaki 02:54, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
further;
- how many bodies founded in the grave ??
- how many of them were "proved" as the missing persons ?
thanksIwazaki 02:13, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
The government prosecutor charged the arrested soldiers for illegally arresting and killing seven Tamil refugees who came to inspect their homes and then burying them at a mass grave at Mirusuvil. [1] case closedRaveenS 20:46, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- So its just another allegation, isnt it ?? Raveen, could you please care to answer my questions above ?? None of it has been answered yet, and you just reverted the topic without even touching them!! I will happily revert it per my questions..if there is no mass grave , why on earth we need an article for this..Hey,also your link doesnt work.thanks.Iwazaki 11:26, 3 March 2007 (UTC)