User talk:AmPat
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Reunion.com
Integrate your information about Reunion.com into the article in an encyclopedic fashion. See for example the classmates.com article, which has a "controversial business practices" section. You could do something similar, just make sure everything is fully documented per policies like WP:A. —Kenyon (t·c) 04:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- You did it again. See WP:NOT#SOAP and WP:DISRUPT. Try to contribute to Wikipedia a little more constructively. —Kenyon (t·c) 21:28, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Reunion.com didn't write the article, people like you and me did. Yes, blatant advertisements are against Wikipedia policy: see WP:NOT#SOAP like I said before. However, I don't think the current version of the article is advertising. If you think some parts are advertisements, then fix those parts. Rewrite parts of the article from a neutral point of view, if you want. I do think the article could use some work, such as replacing those bulleted lists with paragraphed writing. But like I said, include your information in an encyclopedic fashion. See any article on any big company to get an idea of how to do that. You seem to have some good sources, you just need to put them into the article properly. Replacing the entire article with a blurb of your opinions is not helpful. Browse around the help area a little bit to learn more about contributing to Wikipedia. —Kenyon (t·c) 04:32, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
