Andrew Adams (wrongly jailed)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Andrew Adams was sentenced for life in 1993. His case was later referred back to the Court of Appeal by the Criminal Cases Review Commission, which lead to his acquittal.
This case made history as the first time an appeal was launched on the ground the jury was proven to be biased and unfair, after it was shown that several jury members had made disparaging comments about the defendant before the end of the trial. For the first time, jury members gave evidence at the appeal.
The appeal was allowed on not because of the jurors' evidence, but on the grounds that the defence team was ill prepared and failed to include evidence that could have proven Mr Adam's innocence at the time of the original trial. This is probably a more important outcome of the appeal, as many of those who claim to have been convicted of crimes they did not commit allege that their defence teams did not prepare or present their cases adequately. Previously the Court of Appeal had been unwilling to accept the argument that defence lawyers' incompetence or poor work was a reason why evidence supporting the defence case had not been used at the original trial.
[edit] See also
[edit] Sources
- Daily Mail 12 January 2007
- INNOCENT
