MediaWiki talk:Anontalkpagetext

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Rework 1.1 Version 1 1.2 Version 2 1.3 Version 3 2 Spelling error 3 Plainlinks 4 Div id 5 dnsstuff.com links 6 Formatting change 7 External links 8 Information icon

[edit] Rework

The use of he and she, his and her are making this text overly wordy. xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 03:02, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Version 1

Suggested rework:

---

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user. Anonymous users are identified by their numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. If you do not want others to see your IP address here, we recomend creating an account.

xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 03:17, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

Is there a way to include a link here for quick IP whois lookups? — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 03:18, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

Any link could be put in, and would show on every anon's talk page, were you thinking something like a link to ARIN WHOIS or a server side script that would do it for you? xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 03:34, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

I meant a link to ARIN WHOIS which would automatically input the ip address that you're looking at — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 05:14, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

---

Appears to be easy enough to do, e.g. see this link in User Talk space for 207.142.131.203 the code was simply:

[http://ws.arin.net/whois/?queryinput={{PAGENAME}} ARIN]

Resulting in a simple link, prepopulated with the IP info. Perhaps making that at the end of the suggested rewrite, with Address Information instead of ARIN in the example above. xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 05:48, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Version 2

---

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user. Anonymous users are identified by their numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. If you do not want others to see your IP address here, we recomend creating an account.
RIR WHOIS links: ARIN RIPE LACNIC AFRINIC APNIC

I updated the sample posting with working links on 207.142.131.203's Talk Page. Assuming this looks good, what is the steps that would need to be followed regarding editing this MediaWiki page, as they are all protected, would a request for unprotection be the correct route, just asking someone, or does it need to go through something like RFC? xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 16:41, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Just read the information at Wikipedia:MediaWiki_namespace, it is a little ambig, saying changes can be suggested at 3 diferant places, with this being one of them. Is there a way to sandbox this test to be sure that it will work before implementation, e.g. my proposed change uses HTML and WIKI links, but will both of those types work from the area this message is used? xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 16:55, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

They should both work. The MediaWiki: namespace pages are protected. Perhaps we should go suggest this at the Village Pump, because these are good ideas. — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 17:01, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Just added to VPP Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#MediaWiki:Anontalkpagetext xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 18:18, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Whether or not HTML and wikitext are actually parsed depends upon the code; not all system messages are processed in the same way. Furthermore, the entire MediaWiki namespace is protected for a reason. Just clearing those two things up. 86.133.53.111 02:25, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

I agree that it is protected for a reason, a good reason! Thus my desire to make sure this change would be acceptable, both programatically, and for content and usability. xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 04:28, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Version 3

Those changes seem rather helpful; I tweaked the proposal a bit to make the text more concise and the links more user-friendly (below).

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by their numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. If you're concerned with privacy, registering also hides your IP address. [RIR whois lookup: America Europe Africa Asia-Pacific Latin America/Carribeans]

// Pathoschild 02:35, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Those look great, if this goes long enough without complaint, is that ok for getting this section edited? —the preceding unsigned comment is by Xaosflux (talk • contribs) 02:56, January 6, 2006

I'll give it another day just to make sure, but otherwise I think there's been a fair attempt at discussion. // Pathoschild 18:04, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Not sure of the code, or how it would format on diferant resolutions, but is it possible to right justify the rir stuff, without right jsutifiying the rest of the line it is on (I DON'T want to add br's and make more lines to accomplish it!) xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 03:22, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

It's possible, but we should keep templates this important as simple as possible. Simple means fewer unexpected results in an older browser we didn't think to try. ;) // Pathoschild 22:32, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

The template should be made simpler if possible. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 20:16, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Do you have some suggestions? — xaosflux ^Talk 01:00, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Spelling error

Can someone with the appropriate powers change "Carribeans]" to Caribbean"? Thanks, Graham/pianoman87 talk 10:42, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

I fixed the spelling error. Thanks for pointing it out. // Pathoschild (_admin / ^talk) 13:45, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for that. There's still an extra "s" in Caribbean", and there's an extra closing bracket at the end of the message. Graham/pianoman87 talk 10:06, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

<sp_ch>friend</sp_ch>

[edit] Plainlinks

Is there any interest in converting the RIR WHOIS lookup links to <span class="plainlinks">? They look a little strange as-is, imho. ~Kylu (u|t) 03:06, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Tested and implemented. Please let me know if there are any issues from this. — xaosflux ^Talk 05:04, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Absolutely gorgeous! All the annoying little arrows are gone. Thanks! :) ~Kylu (u|t) 05:10, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Div id

Please add <div id="anontalktext">, so people can blank it out in their own css file. --GeorgeMoney ^T·C 21:37, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

If no objections will add in a few days. — xaosflux ^Talk 00:41, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Done. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:16, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] dnsstuff.com links

I moved the dnsstuff inline with the RIR's, but removed ping (something had to go to make it fit on 800x600 screens without scrolling). Pinging vandals doesn't seem very helpful. — xaosflux ^Talk 02:44, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

• Are the 2nd set of links even necessary? DNS Stuff will do WHOIS for anywhere. — BRIAN0918 • 2006-07-22 02:45
  • I'd suggest keep for now, the RIR's are the authoritative sources, dnsstuff.com is a non-free (as in speach) site that threatens automated users with fines. Although this is free (as in speach) information, dnsstuff.com also slaps copyright notices on all their results pages. — xaosflux ^Talk 03:01, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Formatting change

Moved from Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)

As was mentioned at WP:VPT, I think that we need to make the anon talk text at the bottom of anon talk pages more prominant, and not just looking like a copyright notice at the bottom of some web sites. What do you think of this:

—Mets501 (talk) 16:03, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

I like the idea. It's an important part of that page, and it should be prominent. Fagstein 04:58, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Shouldn't this be brought up at MediaWiki talk:Anontalkpagetext? Prodego ^talk 13:25, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Doesn't look bad, will want to make sure this is heavily endorsed though, as it changes millions of pages! I would prefer if the image were a pubilc domain image as well, (that one is GLPGL). Additionally any images transcluded on this page will need to be uploaded to en: and be fully protected. — xaosflux ^Talk 02:32, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Changed to a public domain image (very similar). What do you think? —Mets501 (talk) 15:16, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Momentarily tested the placement on this page, and it looked ok, would like to see more nods here though. — xaosflux ^Talk 01:11, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I agree. Let's wait for a little while (a few days), and if no one objects then we'll try it out. —Mets501 (talk) 02:36, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Fine by me. Prodego ^talk 02:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

*nod*. // [admin] Pathoschild (^talk/_map) 03:42, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

• What? No thick red borders and flashing text? ;) No seriously this looks fine and I don't see a problem to change the look of this particular template without informing people if the content stays the same. - Mgm|^(talk) 18:34, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Why must we always design glowing boxes with images in them in order to distract from the rest of boxes with glowing images on them on pages? Was something broken about the unintrusive plain text that meant it had to have glowing images? -Splash - tk 00:56, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

I moved the padding back from 5em to 1em, this was getting large on browsers with low resolutions, and is closer to the last agreed upon size above. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:16, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

OK, no problem. —Mets501 (talk) 13:29, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] External links

I'd like the external links removed please or changing to proper external links. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 20:11, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

How are the links improper? Fagstein 21:35, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Please clarify (i.e. post a copyable example) what change you are suggesting, and re-add the {{editprotected}} tag. Thanks! JesseW, the juggling janitor 03:24, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Are you suggesting undoing to change requested above MediaWiki_talk:Anontalkpagetext#Plainlinks? If so the page really did look a lot worse (to me at least) without the plainlinks setting. — xaosflux ^Talk 03:40, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

The plain links to me are slightly misleading i thought when i clicked it i was being taken to a wikimedia website (ie. meta). thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 06:30, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Information icon

Does anybody mind if I update the icon from to ? -- Renesis (talk) 18:39, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

I generally prefer svg, but that png looks so much nicer. You can go ahead and change it. —Mets501 (talk) 19:28, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! Glad you like it. I am keeping track of the pages I put this on, and I will be trying to convert it to SVG soon. -- Renesis (talk) 20:11, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

It's been converted to SVG, see here: Image:Information.svg --Cadby ^(talk) 02:49, 29 January 2007 (UTC)