Talk:Architectonic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article covers subjects of relevance to Architecture. To participate, visit the Wikipedia:WikiProject Architecture for more information. The current monthly improvement drive is Castle. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
 |
This article is within the scope of the Philosophy WikiProject, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy and the history of ideas. Please read the instructions and standards for writing and maintaining philosophy articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
This sounds like a disambig page. Xaxafrad 06:09, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] made some improvements
Add some historical notes. will have to get the citation on the german though. Architectonics, as I have heard it used is not always a question of deformation, so took that out. I have heard it used for some very simple structures, and indeed that was its 'original' implication in German when it was used to describe barns and the like.
[edit] Gehry?
Those who use 'architectonics,' as far as I know, would not really point to a building like the Dancing House by architect Frank Gehry. The geological argument is interesting, but etymologically, it would be a new varient on the word, I would think. Maybe that is the way to go. If that is true then one should mention more examples.Brosi 14:16, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Encyclopedia article or dictionary entry?
Is this really an encyclopedia entry? All there seems to be is a series of definitions with etymology, some of it speculative. Mdotley 20:59, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
