User:Arjun01/Adminship
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Arjun has nominated these users
- Gray Porpoise - (70/3/1)
- Dar-ape (failed) - (10/8/3)
- Llama man - (46/3/2)
[edit] Arjun has offered to nominate the following users:
- Anger22, not now he says :(
- Michaelas10 not now, maybe in February-March 2007?
[edit] Arjun is watching these users carefully and may ask to nominate
Ongoing RfAs:
Last updated 11:00, 8 April 2007 (UTC) by Tangobot |
[edit] Arjun's criteria
Here is my special little criteria I use when I judge a candidate for adminship, this is not a checklist as it is just natural to check for these things, the criteria is also not written in stone and can be given to exceptions.
-
-
- RC patrol:Always a plus with me, it is not necessary but it greatly helps. As this is one of the duties that admins are generally expected to do.
- Time: must be around for at least 3 months.
- Wikispace:Must be rather high, Wikispace is vital, and must be involved in XFD's even if it is just once and a while. Admins can use the "delete" button, so they should understand the process of XFD's.
- Featured?: Arjun does not judge a candidate badly if they have no Featured material, whether it be portals, articles, lists or pics. However it is always a grand plus. In a nutshell no 1FA criteria will be judged on you.
- Civility: an absolute must, the candidate should be civil at all times. Admins go through a lot of #*%! which requires a civil outlook and must be calm and not let the vandals/trolls get under their skins.
- User talk: must be a good total of edits, I prefer admins who interact with other users/admins. The candidate must not be afraid to ask questions.
- Userpage: must be clean, and non-inflammatory, political views/religious views are okay, just as long as it is not to the extreme.
- Email: would be a big plus if it is enabled, I would however never oppose if it isn't.
- Wars: must not edit war, edit warring is counter productive and doesn't help wikipedia at all.
-
