From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47b3a/47b3a2e685e7beff041f3d11bd15ce5805a30078" alt="WikiProject Physics" |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics. |
Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. |
??? |
This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics. |
This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
|
|
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Physics because it uses a stub template.
- If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
- If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{Physics}} template, removing {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
|
I put back the previous quote as it is nonsense to state that quantum wells are "artificial atoms" but not-quantum dots. If articial atoms are nanostructures that have discrete energy levels, then quantum dots have this property. In quantum wells, the electron wavefunction is only confined in one dimension, so there is a continuum of energy levels. For this reason, I do not think that quantum wells can be called artificial atoms. We perhaps could refer to the quantum dot section which states that "they are sometimes called 'artificial atoms'" to further clarifiy the issue.
It is true that some scientists may think that quantum dots exhibit properties that differ from real atoms, so the term "artificial atom" is maybe misused but it is a widespread word in the quantum dot community.