Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asdasdasd
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Though if anyone truly wants to make it a redirect, they are very cheap. Sasquatch′↔T↔C 03:27, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Asdasdasd
This is non-encyclopedic
Strong Delete-- Rubbish. Daedalus-Prime 18:28, 18 July 2005 (UTC)- OK, since asdf exists (and not bad at that), I'll change my vote to Redirect. Daedalus-Prime 19:34, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete patent nonsense -Harmil 18:33, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to asdf. •Zhatt• 18:40, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to asdf JoJan 19:02, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect per above. Jaxl 19:15, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, there is nothing to distinguish asdasdasd from jkljkljkl or slaskjaskfjaskf or slfkwqopasf or what have you, so no reason to redirect that particular phrase. Dcarrano 23:36, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Redirect not useful. Qwerty and Asdf have a bit of history behind them, I suppose; this one does not. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 23:38, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy -- nonsense. - Longhair | Talk 00:58, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, would be a bad redirect. humblefool®Have you voted in the CSD poll yet? 02:28, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete/ NO REDIR. Very bad idea for a redirect. Xoloz 04:38, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
