Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ball sweat
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Deletion (CSD G4). Avi 02:35, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ball sweat
Delete Non-notable PWnsivander the Great 00:14, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete The article, in this direct text, was speedily deleted yesterday. From deletion log:
# 01:14, January 31, 2007 NawlinWiki (Talk | contribs) deleted "Talk:Ball sweat" (g8 content was: 'I don't think this page should be deleted. There's very little in the article, but all new articles start out that way. The fact is that ball sweat is...' (and the only contributor was 'Cory Davis')) #01:14, January 31, 2007 NawlinWiki (Talk | contribs) deleted "Ball sweat" (g1 nonsense content was: 'Ball sweat is a colloquial name for the sweat produced by the apocrine sweat glands in a man's genital region. In...')
Page should be speedied then salted. Michael Greiner 00:24, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - not as nonsense, but as {{db-nocontext}}. Note, too, that we are not Urban Dictionary. --Dennisthe2 00:30, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. It's an important part of life. Cory Davis 00:58, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- Can you prove this with verifiable reliable sources that also show notability? --Dennisthe2 01:19, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- One reliable source would be, um, the source of the sweat. That would be the... do I really have to explain this to you? :) Cory Davis 01:31, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- No, there is no need, I am very familiar with my own anatomy. However, you need to provide said sources as above - please see the links that I pointed out, there are three that you need to read. --Dennisthe2 02:19, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- One reliable source would be, um, the source of the sweat. That would be the... do I really have to explain this to you? :) Cory Davis 01:31, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- Can you prove this with verifiable reliable sources that also show notability? --Dennisthe2 01:19, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete funny but this shouldn't be here, at best transwiki over to wiktionary. BJTalk 01:23, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
