Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Almanac
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was MERGE material into WWSB and recast this as a Redirct. Herostratus 17:50, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Black Almanac
Not notable local television programme. Displaced Brit 01:35, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Direct merge/redirect into WWSB. TrackerTV (CW|Castform|Green Valley) 01:38, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete and merge I would have to agree that this program isn't notable, just as a similar sounding program on WABC-TV called Like It Is would be despite being in DMA 1 and being on air longer. Shows like these are worthy of maybe a 'graph or two on the station's page and not its own article. I was going to nominate it myself, but someone else beat me to the punch. TV Newser 02:29, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comment This AFD was apparently nominated by someone who has a Wikipedia:Requests for comment/CFIF against the creator of the article. Despite this, it seems to be a valid nomination. TV Newser 05:04, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, supporting TVN ST47 11:21, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep bad (more like downright horrible)-faith nom with a user who insists on deleting everything I've created or worked on heavily. Seems to be a WP:POINT issue. --CFIF ☎ 12:37, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Merge seems reasonable, good faith nom or not. Just zis Guy you know? 19:07, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Merge - the article only adds two facts independent of the main article -- should be easy enough to merge. Leuko 19:44, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Merge - supporting other "merge" supporters. Worthy to be mentioned , but not enough material to warrant its own article. -- azumanga 03:17, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
