Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Business culture in England
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. -Docg 22:58, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Business culture in England
It's more a bad essay than an encyclopaedia article. An article with this name is bound to be very subjective so I don't think WP is the place for it at all anyway. This is supported by the fact that it is not linked to from any articles. RupertMillard (Talk) 20:43, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOT a publisher of original thought.--Jersey Devil 20:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. It's an essay, not an encyclopaedia article. I would also not be surprised if it was found to have been copied from somewhere, say a Foreign Office guide telling people how to do business with the UK. Sam Blacketer 21:04, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Probably a copyvio. If not, transwiki to Wikibooks or get the author to resubmit to Wikitravel. Otherwise delete. Stifle (talk) 22:07, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- There's an awful lot written about the business culture and etiquette of the British, starting with the whole of chapter 6 of ISBN 0595323316. But this content isn't a good start to an encyclopaedia article on the subject, for the simple reason that it has patently (given the presence in the text of Harvard-style cross-links to absent citations) been copied from somewhere. Delete without prejudice against a proper article based upon the multitude of sources that exist on this subject, including ISBN 1885073283, being written. Uncle G 22:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- I agree Delete this one, but someone could write a proper WP article on the subject later. (PS I work in business in England) NBeale 08:00, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.