Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyboris
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 21:56, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Cyboris
Was tagged as {{db|Article about a minor OS from a company that fails to meet [[WP:CORP]].}}. That's not a valid criterion for speedy, so let's put it to a vote. I recommend delete. Jamie 06:48, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
- Please speedy, from Google there is no evidence that this company is anything but a hoax. Lotsofissues 07:22, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
-
-
- Of course it is. You won't find it in the criteria but practice is a different matter. As a community of informal volunteers, we have the flexibility not to be bound by time-stretching legalistic rules. Intentional time-wasters are not tolerated and sensible editors and admins agree to shove away such nuisances quickly rather than reward them with attention. Lotsofissues 08:13, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
-
- I agree entirely. There is no excuse for wasting everyone's time by listing crap like this on AfD. None. Anyhoo, my vote is delete Reyk 09:33, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
- We should strive to make WP:CSD and speedy deletion practive match. This way there is less controversy, and the deleting admin can delete speedily... I'm all for speedying hoaxes, NN bands, and a whole variety of garbage like that. But we should update WP:CSD to meet current needs. Jamie 11:44, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
- I agree entirely. There is no excuse for wasting everyone's time by listing crap like this on AfD. None. Anyhoo, my vote is delete Reyk 09:33, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
-
- Of course it is. You won't find it in the criteria but practice is a different matter. As a community of informal volunteers, we have the flexibility not to be bound by time-stretching legalistic rules. Intentional time-wasters are not tolerated and sensible editors and admins agree to shove away such nuisances quickly rather than reward them with attention. Lotsofissues 08:13, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
-
- Delete. Note how the article is written in the future tense. Apparently, the OS doesn't even exist yet. I hope it will be great and stable, until then it should go. - Mgm|(talk) 11:37, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. DeathThoreau 19:02, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
