Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Detica
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. JPD (talk) 15:17, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Detica
was listed on {{prod}}, but User:87.74.56.201 removed the tag. Original reason given by User:James084 was "Clearly spam." Peyna 21:16, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- It is not spam it is information about Detica
- Weak keep, notable company, terrible article. Adrian Lamo ·· 00:58, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
- Weak delete per WP:CORP, but I might be persuaded otherwise by information lacking from article. Alexa rank for Detica's website is 496,638. Many Google hits, but most of the first-page ones do little to indicate notability. If their team in their research park's local football league make the first page, how significant are the rest likely to be? Barno 01:11, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - revenue of £43m according to their most recent interim report. Some external mentions ([1], [2], [3], [4], etc.) for what they're worth. -- Jonel | Speak 04:42, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Jonel's research. Stifle 16:43, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. As far as I'm concerned, no real reason given for Prod + no reason given for removal of Prod = no need for AfD. This is a publicly traded company with significant turnover, possibly in the neighbourhood of £100m this year. There are hundreds of articles mentioning Detica's reports and work for the UK insurance industry among other clients. It is an obvious player in its market and fully deserves inclusion here. -- JJay 21:19, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Jonel and JJay. Kappa
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
