Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devilball
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sango123 00:08, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Devilball
Non-notable, very few ghits (except WP mirrors). WP is not for things made up in one school (or vacation) day. Article was de-prod'd with no edit summary by Devilball (talk • contribs • count) — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 02:20, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as vanity and something made up on vacation one day. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 04:20, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Macktheknifeau 05:53, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Per above. Non-notable, and it fails something made up on vacation one day. Daniel's page ☎ 06:23, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete ...per all of the above. StuffOfInterest 13:28, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per all above. NawlinWiki 13:55, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: "Article was de-prod'd with no edit summary" is not a valid ground for deletion. Removal of prod tag merely signifies that the deletion is contested and it must be put up for a vote. Rohirok 17:18, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - Yes, I am aware of that. However, I have also seen it noted in many nominations whether or not there was a prod and if it had been contested, and it was, so I included the info to save other editors the time of checking the article history. I believe the other reasons I listed were quite valid. — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 17:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. (|-- UlTiMuS ( U • T • C | M • E ) 20:12, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 22:17, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator, as much as I hate that "made up in school one day" saying. It sounds lame. RFerreira 21:33, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
