Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duesenberg & Leik Motorsports
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nomination withdrawn. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 20:02, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Duesenberg & Leik Motorsports
Sometimes it seems that race car drivers and organizations get their own article just for existing. These guys have done nothing notable yet, IMHO, and their few Google hits seem to reflect this. Crabapplecove 03:54, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Strongest Possible Keep Team has made 20 starts total this season, and has one top-ten finish. Perfectly meets WikiProject NASCAR's proposed standards. --D-Day I'm all ears How can I improve? 11:13, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Strong keep, full-time Busch team that has started all the races this season and has run well. Meets the wikiproject's standards. The article needs updating. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 11:47, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per above. --JJay 03:07, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Keep if this level of performance is good for nascar, to make them notable in that regard (I have no idea about Nascar). We have articles on scores of "so so" athletes, who are notable just for relatively obscure bits of sports history and fact. rootology 06:25, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per above. JeffMurph 10:00, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: after some lookin' around, apparently there is a wider standard of acceptance on Wikipedia for NASCAR drivers than there is for other sports, and for other people in general. That being the case, I suppose I Withdraw the nomination. I had originally been under the impression that just being in Busch races didn't automatically make someone notable. Crabapplecove 20:02, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
