Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ehsan Imdad
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete └UkPaolo/talk┐ 15:07, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ehsan Imdad
No books on Amazon, googling "Ehsan Imdad" only verifies the BANY presidency. I see no notability yet. Anyone can confirm notability? I don't want to cross WP:BIAS so its a weak delete for me. feydey 17:15, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
- Weak keep. I came up with the same thing that you did; something about it seems as though it's copied from somewhere, so we might have to watch out for copyvio. In any case, I think it barely meets the criteria for a keep, but it's going to need some TLC and cleanup.--み使い Mitsukai 19:47, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Probably he exists. But he is not notable enought to deserve an article. utcursch | talk 11:41, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
W.marsh 20:25, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
W.marsh 20:25, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Unverifiable. Look at this for example, there has seriously nothing been written about the guy. I may be willing to change my vote if someone can come up with written sources, but I don't think that anyone is able to do that.
SoothingR 22:52, 16 February 2006 (UTC) - Delete per nom. — ciphergoth 08:36, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
