Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El-Gouna
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was No consensus - keep. Tyrenius 22:58, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] El-Gouna
advertising the resort (malformed AfD - completing. No vote. ViridaeTalk 08:33, 2 July 2006 (UTC))
- Delete, blatant ad for what seems to be a non-notable resort. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 08:47, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NPOV and WP:SPAM, not notable. SM247My Talk 10:55, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- Weak keep I've edited out the ads and will add a little content when I get some time (there won't be much as it's modern and man-made). Dlyons493 Talk 12:28, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- Weak keep Based on current content. It's pretty thin but at least now it doesn't read as a blatant advert. If it read more as a geographical entry I'd say keep rather than weak keep. In any case it needs expansion. Brian 12:48, 2 July 2006 (UTC)btball
- Delete fails WP:VER and is therefore WP:OR. Ste4k 18:46, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment It's completely verifiable and obviously not original research - just Google it. There are certainly grounds on which one might argue for deletion of this article, but not those ones. Dlyons493 Talk 18:52, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Obviously it is verifiable and that is not the issue. But an article about an un-notable resort is still spam once you've edited out the most obvious advertisement. Pascal.Tesson 19:08, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep as geographic entry (place name), which can be encyclopedically expanded. --MCB 05:30, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
