Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faraz Bhatti
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:05, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Faraz Bhatti
This is a question as to whether a parliamentary candidate has sufficient notability when there is no other coverage. If there has been an AfD on this point about Parliamentary candidates, please point me to it. Is a parliamentary candidate inherently notable? JASpencer 21:03, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Bobet 09:26, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Stretford and Urmston was unwinnable for the Lib Dems in 2005 and Bhatti came a not very distinguished third. He's not a notable party figure and as an opposition councillor in Manchester he doesn't appear to have any specific responsibilities. BTLizard 10:57, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Carleschi is comparable.BTLizard 11:03, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- Sorry, my mistake. There was a comparable case recently, but it wasn't Carleschi. It was a Scottish candidate, though. BTLizard 11:07, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable. QuiteUnusual 11:10, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Long precedent (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonia Bance for one) that Parliamentary candidates are not notable, nor are local authority councillors automatically notable. Fys. “Ta fys aym”. 12:05, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Didn't you mean Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antonia Bance (second nomination)?
- Delete, doesn't establish notability. Dekimasu 10:41, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
