Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Food metaphors for race
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete, see WP:NOT. — Nearly Headless Nick 08:48, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Food metaphors for race
unsourced, unverifable, similar to the racial terms AFD a few months ago Will (Tell me, is something eluding you, Sunshine?)Merry Christmas! 02:35, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Split Infinity (talk) 02:45, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. MER-C 03:07, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. TSO1D 03:23, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and WP:OR wtfunkymonkey 03:25, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, racial slurs have other articles here. Somitho 05:41, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete This falls on the wrong side of WP:OR, WP:V, WP:NOT#IINFO and WP:NOT#DICT and is just listcruft. -- IslaySolomon | talk 06:11, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete passes the fails everything test. SkierRMH,08:12, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, verfiable and interesting. Lovablebeautyme 08:32, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete WP:INTERESTING does not trump WP:V, WP:RS, WP:NOT and WP:NPOV. Guy (Help!) 11:18, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Chuchunezumi 16:51, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep savidan(talk) (e@) 04:21, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- Merge where sourceable to list of ethnic slurs. JDoorjam Talk 04:35, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment I didn't see anything there sourceable. If there were, i'd agree with you. Just H 01:14, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete A bunch of ORs. Just H 01:13, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete like the man said, bunch of OReos.EnabledDanger 03:37, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Reluctant keep. I created this page on the proposition that one ridiculous article is better than ten. Previously we had individual articles for many of these terms. I hope this deletion wouldn't revert us to the previous situation. BTW, for what it's worth, several of these terms are sourced in the pop culture section.--Pharos 04:03, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
