Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hollow book
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was move to book safe. -- King of Hearts talk 01:29, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hollow book
Self-nom, as part of my project to weed out articles I created with made-up names for real things. There really are such things, of course, but the term itself is a neologism and should probably be done away with. -Litefantastic 01:07, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Speedydelete per nom. Fishhead64 01:10, 2 April 2006 (UTC) My bad - forgot to check. Fishhead64 02:13, 2 April 2006 (UTC)- Delete per nom, or move to real name if there is no article. No speedy, there have been several other contributors. (G7 requires that the author be the sole contributor.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:11, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Move to book safe. Quite notable, and a decent article. Hollow book gets 26,400 google hits, but book safe gets 118,000, as well as various sponsored links. -LtNOWIS 02:22, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Move as per LtNOWIS. Notable enough item - the curent name can probably be kept as a redirect, it's a fairly sensible search possibility. Grutness...wha? 03:40, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Move and keep as a redirect per Grutness. JoshuaZ 03:44, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Move to book safe and keep as a redirect per Grutness. --Terence Ong 05:03, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, there isn't a book safe article to redirect to. --Soumyasch 05:05, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Move per above --TBC
??? ??? ??? 05:58, 2 April 2006 (UTC) - Merge As per the above. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 08:09, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Definitely needs cleanup, but not deletion. Move to "Book safe" as above.-Mr Adequate 09:02, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Move and cleanup per Mr Adequate. --Siva1979Talk to me 16:37, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
