Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hypnofetishism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep; move can be discussed further on the talk page of the article, however there is no concensus for it to occur from this AfD discussion. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 02:24, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hypnofetishism
del nonnotable neologism, original research and unverifiable information from non-serious websites: blogs, yahoo groups, etc., arbitrarily interpreted. Not a single reputable reference. Of course, sex and hyphosis is a long history, by syrens are in no way hyphofetishism. If exclude wikipedia, only 173 unique google links, a majority of which are totally meaningless. `'mikkanarxi 16:04, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep and move to Erotic Hypnosis (which gets a lot more Ghits) but has no article at the moment. This article needs a lot of work though. Dina 17:12, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Move — concur with Dina — the only thing wrong with the article is its neologic title, which the recommended move will fix admirably ➥the Epopt 17:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Merge I expect some working girls have made a good living pretending to be hypnotized. Edison 18:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Move as per recommendation of User:Dina Xdenizen 19:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Possible move, but this article is about a relatively popular fetish. A lot of producers of adult content cater to this kink. I agree with Dina's statements also. Robotman1974 20:40, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Also, the deletion template at the top of the article doesn't seem to appear in Firefox. Robotman1974 20:40, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Erotic hypnosis isn't necessarily the same thing as hypnofetishism, as the latter is defined by subjects seeing hypnosis itself as not just erotic, but a required part of sexuality; this term is more accurate. It does need a lot of work, though. Danny Lilithborne 21:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. There is absolutely a hypnofetishist community out there. --Happylobster 05:56, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. There very much is a difference. As well, the different term might help people looking for this entry. --WinterRose 02:17, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
