Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J.R. Hunter
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!?) 05:36, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] J.R. Hunter
My hoax sense is tingling, but only weakly. There are eleven million hits for the string "JR Hunter", but it looks like most of those are references to "junior". Google turns up nothing for the names of some of her alleged works, and nothing for the names of the others when they're combined with the string "hunter". (Except for "the first syllable", which is too damn common to be feasibly searched for.) Anyone? DS 18:07, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --howcheng [ talk • contribs • web ] 19:04, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom and intrinsically unverifiable. She is obscure, not much is known about her, Most of what is known is popular theory rather than fact (which makes it pretty much OR as far as I can see), she is believed to be... If this were re-written as a fictional character (with some evidence that the character actually was published in some verifiable medium) I might change my vote. Tonywalton | Talk 19:14, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per Tonywalton. I'm going to add that I think this might be a notable artist, but I was also unable to get any worthwhile Google hits here and can't see any way to verify the information herein -- I'm not even sure she exists. This might as well be a hoax for all we know. If someone can come up with solid references for this thing, I'm all for keeping it, but unless that happens, I think it should go. -- Captain Disdain 20:13, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
-
- Indeed. I'd be quite willing to accept this this is not a hoax, but as the link I mentioned above says, 'The WP policy is: Wikipedia should only publish material that is verifiable and is not original research.. Tonywalton | Talk
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
