Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limonese Authentic Party
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep. Deathphoenix ʕ 00:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Limonese Authentic Party
Non-notable. I can't find many google hits under either English or Spanish name. Most of the goolges hits are for wikipedia and its mirrors. Can't find evidence that it has had a candidate win an election. Minimal data to even support its existance. RJFJR 17:48, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- Comment I added some documentation to my Talk page under your request for info. Paltry info on a very small party that was in existence for maybe 4 elections. Interlingua talk 02:32, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- keep nice little stub for a less than huge subject. seems to work fine. Joeyramoney 19:17, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- Weak keep NOt famous, but notable: the party had importance at least in the 1970s in Costa Rica. In a Wikipedia of 1,000,000+ articles, I think an article of this length for a party of that (small) importance is about right. Interlingua talk 00:40, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- Strong keep. Real political party, which several references. Relevance of political parties cannot be seen only in the context of election results. --Soman 08:41, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- Comment The now dead link at the bottom of the page came from the Superior Electoral Tribunal. Definatively certifies existance of the party. --Soman 08:43, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Good working stub on a real party. Wikipedia can be too quick to delete articles on minor parties. This one is sound. Keresaspa 12:55, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
