Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Lorrey
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mackensen (talk) 22:33, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Mike Lorrey
Not notable, no real assertion of notability Deville (Talk) 00:01, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Weak keep. The page was vandalized, which I have now fixed. The new version has more notability without all the disgusting slander that was there. I think one of his opponents is trying to re-work the article. Grandmasterka 00:14, 7 May 2006 (UTC)- Delete per nom. --MaNeMeBasat 08:51, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
- Weak keep or delete. I believe Mike Lorrey started this himself. I added some info that I know about. The edits are not vandalism. I reverted them. I can provide links for most you think is. Most of the info comes from mike lorrey himself.
for the muslim/pig stuff see: http://www.xanga.com/Sadomikeyism/88688608/item.html
for the Mike Lorrey holiday: http://www.xanga.com/Sadomikeyism/176277938/item.html
For Mike Lorrey's SAT scores and other history: http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:WJaXVjM0rH4J:nh.sevatech.com/wiki/index.cgi/Mike_20Lorrey+mike+lorrey+afb+el&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=2
If newbie observations are not welcome on an AfD, ignore my comments. If I violate any rules or etiquette, please let me know. Most of Lorrey’s “notability” appears to be self generated. It appears he wrote both the Wiki article and the blog it is based on, sort of referencing himself, as opposed to referencing credible published articles by unbiased writers.
This is Mike Lorrey: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Mlorrey
- Thank you! This was very helpful, and I clearly was mistaken about what I thought was slander. I will say delete. Being an activist is not enough notability, and as was said, a lot of his "notability" is self-generated. Grandmasterka 09:02, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Zaxem 09:37, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - no notability aside from his own materials. -- Kaszeta 18:25, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
