Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naughty chair
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep, nomination withdrawn and closed early by nominator. Kusma (討論) 15:57, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep per withdrawal. – Sceptre (Talk) 16:17, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Naughty chair
poorly written, non-wikified and highly opiniated article grafikm_fr 19:00, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
This is a poorly written, non-wikified and highly opiniated article. It was proposed on the talk page to delete it and redirect Child time-out. grafikm_fr 18:59, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete No need for redirect since it isn't a common term. JoshuaZ 19:37, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- delete per JoshZ. Bucketsofg 20:16, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep if rewritten a rubbish page, but if rewritten could be useful—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.36.107.54 (talk • contribs).
- Redirect to Child time-out. The term may not be very common, but I think it's common enough for a redirect. --Allen 00:36, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect as per Amcbride. This term is likely to be searched for. Capitalistroadster 01:20, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Redirect per Capitalistroadster and Allen. -AED 08:10, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. New edits look much better. -AED 18:10, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. I've just edited and wikified it - largely restoring it to the situation it was in before being vandalised. It had attracted three different editors before being attacked. I wouldn't know which way round to redirect or merge, nor the significant differences between a general time out and a naughty chair, but would suggest at this stage leaving the article to develop and see what happens. SilkTork 17:42, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- Indeed, your version looks much better! ^_^ grafikm_fr 18:06, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per SilkTork. Grue 21:22, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Okay, seems like everyone agrees to keep the new version of the article. I'm removing the afd tag on the page! grafikm_fr 14:23, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
