Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. – Robert 04:09, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti
No meaningful content, no references, seems more a page for vandalism than anything educational. -- Jbamb 15:41, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
The information on the page is accurate description of Mr Bugti, a habitual offender in Baluchistan. Some Bugti supporters are now trying to shut the page down under guise of "vandalism". I think its important to keep this page as events in Baluchistan will continue for a few years and Mr Bugti will continue to play a destructive role. (—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 4.153.242.178 (talk • contribs).)
- Delete Clearly NPOV, at best. Garbage at worst. -- Jbamb 06:36, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Keep the Bugti article for relevance and information. (—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.73.36.67 (talk • contribs).)
- Strong Keep — important political figure.[1] Former governor of Balochistan, by appointment. — RJH 16:52, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
- Fine, if they can manage to keep some NPOV, then keep. -- Jbamb 17:07, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. I have tidied it and added categories; important traditional leader and political figure. Humansdorpie 22:31, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. very notable historical figure --Vyzasatya 23:42, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. minor political figure, but certainly more meaningful than the Wikipedia libel vandal whose notoriety we've collectively decided to keep. Carlossuarez46 21:54, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.