Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nickdisk Forums
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the nomination was delete. – Avi 00:48, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Nickdisk Forums
Created by owner of current version, none-notible, advertisement.-- 9cds(talk) 09:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 |
ATTENTION!
If you came here because somebody asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus amongst Wikipedia editors on whether a page or group of pages is suitable for this encyclopedia. We have policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. You can participate and give your opinion. Please sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing!Note: Comments made by suspected single purpose accounts can be tagged using
|
- Delete per nom. Not notable. DarthVader 09:19, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Despite the claimed vicissitudes of the site, I have a very hard time swallowing that a forum with only 147 registered members is "one of the most popular Nickelodeon fan boards," unless a lot fewer people give a damn about Nickelodeon than the Nielsen ratings would suggest. RGTraynor 09:20, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per RGTraynor.--Andeh 09:33, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. --Kungfu Adam (talk) 19:31, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- Do Not Delete The board was once very popular with over 750 active members posting at times until problems had with the adminstrator slowed the board down. The old board is gone and you'll never be able to see the screenshots again. Keep the article as a stub. Spongefan 16:04, July 7 2006 (EST)
- Keep It's a popular website and it needs to be kept --Stimpy101 03:09, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- Comment: Above user's first edit. That aside, Wikipedia is not a memorial, even of websites. Plainly it is not currently a popular site, and 750 active members wouldn't really pass muster as a popular fan site for a TV network either. No doubt some fan of the old board can host a webblog with those screenshots, but it isn't Wikipedia's purpose to do so. RGTraynor 04:18, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
