Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oak Park Shuttle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 04:00, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Oak Park Shuttle
Prod removed by 193.217.242.140 (talk • contribs • WHOIS) whose contributions seem to be centered on removing prods that I put up. (see JudoJoe Productions, Orion globe). In any case, this is an article about a bus route. The supporting source is... the bus schedule. The rationale for the removal of the prod was "This is not a schedule, but an article about a bus service. Removed the part about passengers complaining to drivers for being hard to verify." In fact, it's not your everyday bus route, it's a shuttle that takes six passengers. Even the Yellow Pages wouldn't have this info... Pascal.Tesson 04:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, I love Oak Park, but this is not notable. --Dhartung | Talk 04:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. MER-C 05:53, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom... no notability whatsoever. SkierRMH,08:05, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete trivial 6 passenger vehicle. Edison 20:23, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete -- I can't see how a six-passenger shuttle van (van!) route in the very populous metro Chicago area could possibly be notable. When it gets up to the level of, say, Boston's Silver Line, then maybe. Haikupoet 01:34, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete It's a van that loops around a business district. Hey, bus routes would be more notable then this, and bus routes are rarely kept.-- danntm T C 03:10, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete -- perhaps move one sentence to Oak Park, IL, Frank Lloyd Wright or to Chicago Tours, but not an entry by itself. SweetGodiva 22:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.