Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oshvision
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Daniel Bryant 02:39, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Oshvision
This article deals with a minor company, Oshvision, that no longer exists. During its existence, it produced a few computer games, and was run by two teenagers. Previous versions of the article (over eight months ago) were incoherent, there were issues with copyright (see my comment below) and I speedily deleted some of them back then. However, as I recently found out, the creator of the article perceived this as censorship and still thinks Wikipedia should have an article about Oshvision. I told him I'd restore it, and properly nominate it for deletion, so the whole community could have a say in it and he could contribute to the discussion himself. Last year, it didn't meet our company inclusion criteria, and these days there are still no secondary sources that could ever serve as a source for the article. JoanneB 11:49, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Delete - no evidence of multiple non-trivial coverage in third-party sources to establish notability per WP:CORP. Although I sympathise with the author's opposition to censorship, the burden of proof is on the author to show that the company meets Wikipedia notability criteria. Delete unless appropriately sourced by the end of this AfD. Walton Vivat Regina! 13:26, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
I have reciently updated the artical, and I dont really understand why certain copyrights were mentioned??? as all the content belongs to me anyway? and if I the owner wish to distribute my images of my companys logos on wiki, like other major companies then its oK??? Contact me how i can upload images which wont get deleted because they got copyright on them?
Oshvision 13:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- My apologies. I remembered something about copyright issues with your images, but I looking through the history of the images you used, it seems to be that at first it just wasn't clear what the correct licenses were for the images you provided. Even if you've made certain images yourself, without the correct tagging, they can't be used. However, I think that I was wrong in including that in this nomination, it has nothing to do with the current discussion. --JoanneB 14:22, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. No attribution with reliable sources in article. Searching myself: 13 unique Google web hits and no book or news hits. In short, appears to be nothing present or ever able to be added that would satisfy WP:CORP or WP:WEB.--Fuhghettaboutit 13:36, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per fuhgettaboutit; nothing in lexis-nexis, either. semper fictilis 18:15, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
