Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Precocious
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Docg 14:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Precocious
Somewhat checkered history for such a small article. Was created by User:Precociousone with a C&P from a dictionary,then tagged for speedy as a copyvio. The original editor then rewrote it, removing the copyvio, and I prodded it, as a dicdef. User:86.134.221.85 then blanked the page (removing the prod)& rewrote it again. None of these rewrites have substantially addressed the real matter here, which is that this is a dictionary definition and can never grow beyond that. The same editor has also created Contumely and removed the speedy tag under similar circumstances. Dina 19:43, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. I hope that Wikitionary already has this. -Amarkov blahedits 20:03, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Dicdef, copyvio Bwithh 20:04, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. See Wiktionary instead. --Metropolitan90 20:06, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete WP is not a dictionary. TSO1D 20:25, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Metro - WP:WINAD Ck lostsword|queta!|Suggestions? 20:55, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Danny Lilithborne 22:21, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:WINAD. Precociousness would be a better article title, and the article could talk about the prevalence of precociousness, its effects and causes, etc. And once you conjure what the article could contain, it seems intuitive from the term's relative broadness that this does not belong to an encyclopaedia. —Goh wz 16:13, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
