Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Armenian army
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Red Armenian army
- – (View log)
Not notable enough, no reliable sources barely any information only bias sources if found based on research it should be deleted. Artaxiad 22:30, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. Artaxiad 22:32, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Google hits [1] Artaxiad 22:33, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete even if it was sourced, it hardly qualifies as notable.--Domitius 22:53, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep, it is a reality, has enough sources, need to development.Must.T C 10:24, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- That is your defense? if this is a "reality" good for it. It does NOT have enough sources. Artaxiad 10:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Listen, I don't know what is going on, but I think that you guys should give it a rest. As far as notability goes, the main criteria is the outside referrals to an organization/person/etc. It has its own file in the MIPT Database [2]. I haven't done more research on it to be honest. Now, I don't want to get into an argument over how many attacks a group must have carried out in order to have a page in Wikipedia and what makes those "attacks" notable, but the article looks descent enough, is concise, has an outside referral from a reasonable non-partisan specialized source and doesn't violate any Wiki rules as far as I see (WTA, OR etc). Keeping it cool, what seems to be the problem with this article? (for a notability sidenote, check this out: Category:Communist parties of Turkey - there is even a "party" in there which I know for a fact is run by ten people from an office in a Paris suburb! :)) Baristarim 10:54, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Your going too far off topic. Artaxiad 10:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- True, my last comment (and this) was/is off topic.. I had been wanting to tell others what a WP:N violation that category is!! What is this for example? New Build-up organization? They surely must have been running out of ideas for a name, weren't they? Baristarim 11:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Okay. Artaxiad 11:48, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Weak delete I don't believe it has enough sources to provide any reason that the article can grow/develop anymore than it already has. The group was responsible for one "attack", two decades ago. --Rayis 13:13, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep the only feasible way to deal with political movements is to consider them notable if they have a name and a source. trying to judge importance will inevitably produce irreconcilable disputes. The discussion here is a good example of why that's the way to think about these. DGG 16:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep or Rename to Armenian Red Army, as it is how the group is referred to by MIPT. denizTC 16:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
