Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rysin Online

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Avi 06:11, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rysin Online

Rysin Online (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article has some assertions of notability, namely the Scottish papers. However, they appear to be local papers and the coverage is minimal. Google hits for "Rysin Online" and RysinOnline are scarce, and there were no hits on the news database LexisNexis. Thus fails WP:CORP and WP:WEB. -SpuriousQ (talk) 00:36, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Icemuon 01:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - fails WP:CORP. MER-C 02:14, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - From the site's homepage: "With 8098 unique visits to the site and 26287 unique page views, Rysin Online is on course for an even better year." [1] - Seems notable for such a young kid to have made such hullabaloo, to me; however, I'll have to sit on the fence with this one. אמר Steve Caruso _(desk/AMA) • Give Back Our Membership! 03:02, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete this spam. Edeans 03:58, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep sources are reliable. Westenra 06:33, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable.Tellyaddict 17:32, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Author has made contributions (almost?) solely to files and pages pertaining to this subject. WP:CORP and spam Tuvok ^ ^{Talk | Desk | Contribs} 12:42, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete This article and the related material added to Anaglyph image is self-promotion. If the software lives up to its genius claims, then an article will be well-deserved. Until that time, this article should be deleted. TheMindsEye 14:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep The information on this article is correct and was featured in these papers, I am in no way involved with Rysin Online (as i think they are reffering to above), but most people round the Ayrshire Area are aware of it. DasPlan100 15:16, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment I don't dispute that the papers are accurate, but the coverage is more along the lines of "a local teenager has released a popular software package" (and that's based merely on self-reported download statistics) rather than a non-trivial account of his company and its impact itself. If this company were notable, we would see more in-depth coverage outside of the local papers. -SpuriousQ (talk) 16:07, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep I have tried to make an article on Rysin Online before it was featured in these local papers (although I knew nothing of this coverage) Fanta206 22:53, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Do you know of other sources about this company? This article continues to be created and deleted (I just checked the logs now) because no non-trivial sources have yet been provided. -SpuriousQ (talk) 01:15, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment I saw the site on several sites such as WaveStreaming, Stream Solutions, Talk ShoutCast (all of these sites are SHOUTcast related, Rysin Online's link is on all of their pages. each and every page on each site). When I saw the site, there was an article on "AboutUs" for the site, all of the content from that has now been removed by me and moved to the wikia article. (it will be in the history). That AboutUs Page linked to this wikia page. I have seen the site else where too, but that's as far as i'm going to go. Fanta206
      • I see a link to the Rysin Online site is on the footer of each of those sites, but that is not what is meant by a source. We need non-trivial, independent, and credible information about the company, such as from a detailed news article. -SpuriousQ (talk) 09:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
        • Well I just knew about the site through that info that was on the AboutUs page :-) (Fanta206) 13:10, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.