Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Han Lee - Tathagata
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Proto::► 11:09, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sam Han Lee - Tathagata
Delete nonverifiable self-written prophet. Mukadderat 04:11, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:BIO. TJ Spyke 04:24, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per above. MER-C 06:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Self Written ?? this was written by me.. my name is Paul Iddon,, so why say the article was self written ? the aticle has come about because I added Sam Han lee to the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Buddha_claimants
Although someone keeps deleting it,, what is it about ? List of Buddha Claimants ? If someone claims to be buddha then they go on that page ? So why keep deleting it.. Sam Han Lee not only claims to be Buddha, but is the only one who has any proof.. proof by having the third eye on his forehead,,,, proof in his actions that he travels non stop around the world teaching others,,, proof in his words that nobody can deny, proof that he is the only one that does not "sell" or profit from teaching.
- Keep I believe there is some notability here. ( My third eye tells me so! LOL) It seems to me that the author has a bit of a language barrier that he/she may be struggling with. The author needs guidance regarding appropriate writing style and standards for Wikipedia. Perhaps some editors who have worked on articles related to mysticism and Buddha can take a look at this and give the author some help? I sense there is something here worth saving. Cleo123 08:36, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:BIO and article is entirely original research. Tendancer 22:21, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
