Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secrets and glitches in Battlefield 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. moink 00:05, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Secrets and glitches in Battlefield 2
Almost exclusively original research, with no attempt at verifiability. A previous article on the same topic, Battlefield 2 Bugs and Exploits was deleted for the same reason. Remy B 04:24, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and WP:NOR. --Fuhghettaboutit 04:31, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as OR -gamingology.Blnguyen 05:40, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, OR, and even if it can be verified, it's still gamecruft. JIP | Talk 06:53, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete if those are valid tips, they should be added to the various existing Battlefield 2 articles. Elfguy 14:03, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Some of this material previously existed in the Battlefield 2 article but was moved into the Battlefield 2 Bugs and Exploits article (see my opening line) after I noted that it should be removed for being original research with no sources. I dont think it would be a good outcome for the material to end up back in the Battlefield 2 article without being strictly verifiable. Otherwise, the section will (as it previously did) turn into informal commentary and personal accounts. Remy B 14:50, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Wikipedia is not GameFAQs. —Wrathchild (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per WP:NOT. Dustimagic *\o/* (talk/contribs) *\o/* 22:15, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Same reasons as above. Picking up SF weapons doesn't sound like an exploit, either. TaintedMustard 08:32, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
- Keep don't delete just because you are not interested. Lapinmies 13:55, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
