Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silvania Studios
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Kimchi.sg 15:32, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Silvania Studios
Non-notable software company; just started; no releases; fails WP:CORP (attempted Prod). mtz206 (talk) 15:13, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:CORP. New company without an actual game yet. Articles for CEO and the game they are developing should also be deleted. DrunkenSmurf 15:27, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- This should not be deleted as yes Michael is the CEO and it is now listed as a team. This is unfair justice please reconsider. Neoki
- Delete. I also agree with DrunkenSmurf: delete the game and CEO's articles. All seem to have been written by people in the company (see the 1st person references in the game's article), and none are of any notability as of yet. The
secondthird Google result for "Silvania Island" is a bloody forum thread where a company employee is advertising the game as they're doing here. Come on. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 15:32, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- CEO listed as speedy delete, and company's AfD is here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silvania Island (game) --mtz206 (talk) 15:34, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- This is a little but unfair. Please explain why it must be deleted. All new games must start some where. It is a non-profit game. It is free to play and is in development. Yes the second search is a forum thread but so what. What does this matter. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Neoki (talk • contribs).
- The Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a vessel for advertisement. The topic has to be notable or encyclopedically useful in some way in order to be included. Your game is not out yet, and has practically zero hype around it, let alone any notability. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 15:40, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- I would like to see the game kept up. There are more than a few people interested in it. -- Talk| 1:44am, 21 June 2006
- Comment. This is this newly created user's first edit. Please do not resort to sock puppetry. This is not a vote, and there is no ballot box to stuff. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 15:46, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete As I said in the other AfD on this item, per WP:NOT this is not the place to advertise your upcoming game Wildthing61476 16:05, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete burninate the whole lot. Danny Lilithborne 20:44, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- as i keep saying i am not advertising it. People keep asking what its about so i said read this. People read it and goes oh thats what it is. So not advertising it purley explains what it is. Now stop being childish and just let silvania explain what it is, hence what this site was set up for Neoki 21:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Comment, you're ignoring what we've said. Quoting myself: "The Wikipedia is an encyclopedia... The topic has to be notable or encyclopedically useful in some way in order to be included.". The Wikipedia was established to be an "open encyclopedia", not somewhere to promote largely unknown things, even if they are non-commercial. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 22:08, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.