Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sopme

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was to Speedy Delete the article. Ëvilphoenix ^Burn! 02:50, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sopme

Neologism--Shanel 00:40, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

ATTENTION! If you came to this page because this post on facepunchstudios.com told you to come here and vote, please note that this is not a vote on whether or not this article is deleted. Despite what you may have been told, it is not true that everyone who shows up to a deletion discussion gets an automatic vote just for showing up. The deletion process is designed to determine the consensus of opinion of Wikipedia editors; for this reason comments from users whose histories do not show experience with or contributions to Wikipedia are traditionally given less weight and may be discounted entirely. You are not barred from participating in the discussion, no matter how new you may be, and we welcome reasoned opinions and rational discussion based upon our policies and guidelines. However, ballot stuffing is pointless. There is no ballot to stuff. This is not a vote, and decisions are not made purely upon weight of numbers.

• I disagree on the grounds that Shanel used a word I dont understand - leelad - unsigned comment by anon user:83.100.154.11
  • "Neologism" means a new word. Kappa
• Delete, wikipedia is not a dictionary. Kappa 00:59, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, as per Kappa. --Allen3 ^talk 01:26, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• I disagree that this must be deleted! SOPME FOREVAH! -DarkFlame - unsigned comment by anon user:24.67.253.203
• Sopme I disagree on the...hehe...YAY! -Sopme - unsigned commeny by anon user:72.29.38.96
• DONT DELETE SOPME IS OUR SAVIOUR! THERE ARE SOPMEISTS EVERYWHERE! - unsigned comment by user:TheBlackViper whose edits thus far are only to this article and to this deletion discussion. The same user also edited the comment of user:24.67.253.203 above. I have reversed that edit.
• Delete neologism, admitted joke. Note to closing admin: don't forget to delete the pictures too! Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:14, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: At this point in the discussion, anon user:72.29.38.96 page-blanked this discussion. reverted by user:Kappa
• Comment: Folks, we are going to delete this thing whatever you say, no offense. If you want to share it with people try, Wiktionary has a place for it at Wiktionary:List of protologisms Kappa 02:20, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Yeah, ok. It's moved to Wiktionary. Sorry for all the retardness. But now we get to start all over there. Yay. (sopme) - unsigned comment by anon user:72.29.38.96
• Delete. "Note that this is a joke and to not be taken seriously." Wikipedia is not a joke book. And it's not even funny. Yay. TheMadBaron 02:26, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Yay for Kappa and his/her Wiktionary. Thanks. -Sopme! - unsigned comment by anon user:24.67.253.203
• I disagree that this should be be deleted. - unsigned comment by anon user:70.24.38.250
• Comment: At this point in the discussion, the page was vandalised by anon user:72.29.38.96 who attempted to replace the discussion with nonsense. Reverted by user:Meelar.
• You can't kill the sopme... - unsigned comment added by anon user:144.131.162.182
• Comment: At this point in the discussion, the page was vandalized by anon user:24.254.222.142 who attempted to remove all the "delete" comments. In the next edit, anon user:24.185.197.213 page-blanked the discussion. The page-blanking was reverted by user:Joy Stovall. The rest of the vandalism was reverted by user:Aranda56.
• SOPME IS OUR SAVIOUR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! - unsigned comment by anon user:84.58.16.205
• Speedy Delete as nonsense and Protect from recreation --JAranda | watz sup 03:05, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: At this point in the discussion, anon user:70.24.38.250 vandalized the page by deleting several comments. Those comments were later found and restored by user:Nameneko
• Speedy delete, patent nonsense. — ceejayoz ^★ 03:14, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete the images also. - Stoph 03:18, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  • I've listed the images for deletion already. -Nameneko 03:21, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete and delete the one on Wiktionary while you're at it. -Nameneko 03:21, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete -- ( drini's _vandalproof page ☎ ) 03:22, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Don't delete the wiktionary one, they told us to put it there. - unsigned comment by anon user:72.29.38.96
  • Au contraire, they didn't tell you to put it on Wiktionary; they suggested it. Besides, it doesn't qualify for its own article on Wiktionary anyways, as it's a protologism. -Nameneko 03:27, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Nice art but a neologism based on a typo on a website is not notable. Wiktionary is a different site and this vote will have no influence on them. Capitalistroadster 03:25, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• DONT DELETE New words are added to every language every day let this be another one! - unsigned comment by anon user:65.67.60.119. In this user's next edit, he/she removed several "delete" comments. Vandalism reverted by user:Kirill Lokshin. The anon user again attempted to remove comments and was again immediately reverted by user:Kirill Lokshin
• Delete nonsense. --rob 05:10, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete not notable, not encyclopaedic. --Qirex 05:26, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Bottom line. "Note that this is a joke and to not be taken seriously.". Saberwyn 07:08, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete garish nonsense --Anetode 07:47, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete deliberate nonsense Bwithh 07:52, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• DONT DELETE sopme is too awesome to delete, you cant.(not influenced by mentioned post)- IpHa - unsigned comment by anon user:69.208.71.162
• Delete, Pathetic attempt at a fad. - unsigned comment by anon user:82.18.103.53 who initially "signed" the post as user:Cheeez but later removed that signature.
• Comment: At this point in the discussion, the page was again blanked, this time by anon user:24.6.139.85. Reverted by user:Joy Stovall
• Neologism, spam, vanity. Delete, candidate for speedy deletion. - Mike Rosoft 16:12, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete please! --MacRusgail 16:32, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Strongest Possible Delete In The History of Wikipedia: This vote should be closed already, but I didn't want to do it just because I wanted to show my support against the Sockpuppets. I'm also heading over to the Wiktionary version and making sure it's burned with fire and putting it on my watch list over there so it never comes back again. Karmafist 18:15, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• JESUS H CHRIST... Delete. Non-notable, a la Chebs. The Land 19:25, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. The page is absoult nonsense. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by The Republican (talk • contribs) 20:03, 23 October 2005 (UTC).
• Delete, nonsense. --Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 20:42, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. BTW, a very good infobox, and I hope to see it more often in similar circumstances. --Agamemnon2 21:19, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
  • The infobox is {{AfdAnons}}. — ceejayoz ^talk 22:11, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep delete. I listed it as such.—Gaff ^ταλκ 22:51, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Very Speedy delete vanity RadioActive 22:52, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete ASAP in agreement with all of the speedy criteria mentioned above. --Fire Star 22:56, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete when the word becomes widely used then it can have an article. Cedars 23:23, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Kappa voted to delete!?!! Hey, I'm going ice skating down below! MCB 00:49, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.