Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sydneyroosters1910
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP (no consensus) - moved to Sydney Roosters 1910 Season. TigerShark 23:12, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sydneyroosters1910
This page and its companions below were deleted pursuant to an AfD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sydneyroosters1909. A DRV consensus determined that this decision should be reevaluated in light of a newer AfD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sydney Roosters 1911 Season, which brought forth new evidence on the matter. Please read the provided debates before commenting here. This is a procedural relisting, so I abstain (except to that, if kept, this article must be renamed), obviously. Xoloz 17:22, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep this page on the basis of the favourable retention of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sydney Roosters 1911 Season. I am also in favour of this article being renamed Eastern Suburbs 1910Sbryce858 23:36, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Encyclopedic article on a notable team. Additionally, rename this page to Sydney Roosters 1910 Season to be consistent with the previously kept article. Further renaming would probably be better discussed on the articles' talk pages. ScottW 02:24, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. The result of every Sydney Roosters game (and by extension every "major league" sporting event anywhere, ever) is too much. At worst, gather all the results for all teams to 1910 NRL Season, though frankly, a page with the final ladder would more than suffice. We don't store heat results for the Olympics ... that's too much information. -- GWO
- Keep It is perfectly feasible that over time (many years) we can work up to provide this level of detail on a comprehensive basis. Athenaeum 11:49, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
