Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Art of Silence
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete (if we were vote counting, it's 4-3 delete, so no consensus, leaning towards delete, but AFD is not a vote). The three links provided - the sole justification for keeping - are sixth form reviews (ie, twelfth grade). Calton provides the best argument. Proto///type 08:54, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The Art of Silence
No assertion of notability for this play other than it was performed in Paraguay; author is redlinked NawlinWiki 18:37, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect to J.J. Jeczalik. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:52, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- Comment J.J. Jeczalik's musical project shares its name with this play but, I believe, nothing else. --DaveG12345 10:47, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Keep If I do a google search for "The Art of Silence" "Hartley", it returns several articles reviewing the play including [1] , [2], [3] etc. Seems to me this article just needs to be expanded to include a summary of the play and links to some of these sources. DrunkenSmurf 20:46, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Richardcavell 01:09, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Smurf. --badlydrawnjeff talk 02:54, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Part of a larger body of work by a notable playwright/author? Widely read? Widely produced? Historically important? Holding of some sort of superlative? Subject to multiple instances of critical analysis? No to all of the above, it seems: a few notices in the paper don't even come CLOSE to making this notable or even noticable. --Calton | Talk 04:51, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete nn and contains a lot of red links. I say the only useful info there is the external link. --WinHunter (talk) 00:23, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of success or notability. BlueValour 22:07, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep based on those links. --JJay 01:32, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
