Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trevor Loflin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge into SAT. KrakatoaKatie 03:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Trevor Loflin
Impressive, but I don't think it's notable enough to warrant an article Garion96 (talk) 22:35, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep per WP:BIO as he has been the subject of multiple sources that are reliable and independent of the subject of the article. Quite honestly, I won't be upset if it's deleted, but given that he meets WP:BIO (even if only barely) and is unique for his achievement, I think he should remain. -- Black Falcon 23:10, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- Merge into SAT. Fifteen minutes of fame doesn't merit its own article, but it is verifiable material that could be used on a larger page. I think there should be a guideline about WP:BEINGONTHENEWSONCEDOESN'TMAKEYOUFAMOUS. --Wafulz 23:12, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- There is WP:NOTABILITYISNOTTHESAMEASFAME. ;) However, I believe your suggestion to be an appropriate one regarding the organisation of content if an appropriate section within the SAT article is suggested. -- Black Falcon 23:32, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- Merge into SAT, falling back on Delete if it won't fit. He barely meets WP:BIO, the CNN transcript is of a video from the other news source used as a reference, so I don't see them as 2 separate sources. The "bio" reference is from his employer, so it is not "independent of the subject." The last one, I'm not entirely what it is, but Loflin isn't mentioned until the second to last paragraph, so he is hardly the subject of it. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 23:52, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
