Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivephilia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy del mikka (t) 02:41, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Vivephilia
Obscure neologism, previously deleted NeilN 00:12, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Neologism even by the creator and its been deleted many times before here. Jobe6 Image:Peru flag large.png 00:44, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. This has been deleted already, but I have reworked it to make more sense. If anyone is planning to "speedy" it on the mere record of its past deletions, I would urge them to look through it as it is now. If they still think it is not valid, I would prefer it be sent to the "Deleted Jokes" section. But, to be quite honest, I don't know anything about these other deletions. As far as I knew, it was a one-shot thing (till now)... Of course, they go to show that it has been considered more times, by more than a single person. I must also point out that, as a neologism, it opens the language to an entirely new species of individual. Whatever you might say of it, I still contest that it is a useful word. Scoff if you will; it can't be denied. Whoever sees it as nonsense, with its new material, can't have much more than sour prejudice against the article. I rest my case. WAS 00:59, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
-
- Comment See Wikipedia:Neologism --NeilN 02:23, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - Recreating previously deleted article is grounds for immediate deletion. This is a pointless neologism and just plain stupid. DreamGuy 01:03, September 5, 2005 (UTC)
- speedy deleted original research voted for deletion. mikka (t) 02:41, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
