Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Witold Gustaw Pawel Maria Czartoryski
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 02:18, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Witold Gustaw Pawel Maria Czartoryski
Speedy delete. Not even an article.
- Delete per nom JackO'Lantern 01:40, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above --TBC
??? ??? ??? 01:46, 20 March 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete, A1. Tagged(due to Crzrussian's edit). Delete, unless it can be properly expanded and sourced so that it satisfies WP:BIO.PJM 01:46, 20 March 2006 (UTC)- Speedy delete --Allen 01:47, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Well, hold it, author did add cats, implying that this WGMPC dude is a member of the Czartoryski noble clan, and added him to that page as well. Now, I happen to think that that was a bogus addition, which is why I am not voting keep here, but this is not speedy. Give the author a few days to prove this is a bona fine Czartoryski noble. I am removing the tag and adding a few words to the article. Delete unless author proves relation to Czartoryski clan. the.crazy.russian (T) (C) (E) 01:52, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete It's a stub that's been there for a month with no content. It appears to have been created for no reason other than to resolve a redlink in Czartoryski. Fan1967 02:11, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as above.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 04:37, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic! (T/C) 04:52, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Google gives 10 results for a search on "Witold Gustaw Pawel Maria Czartoryski," only 3 of which are not Wikipedia pages; "about 39" for a search on "'Witold Czartoryski' 1983," but many of those look like genealogical pages; WP:NOT a genealogical dictionary. Hbackman 05:03, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 05:20, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Saying "noted" doesn't make it so. dcandeto 06:15, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above ~Linuxerist L / T 07:08, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Hbackman. --Icarus 08:08, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Czartoryskicruft, unlikely to ever contain any encyclopedic information. This is what we get for putting in too many redlinks as we write. Robin Johnson 11:05, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Nice - I'll add that one to my hall of fame... "Czartoryskicruft"... awesome! - the.crazy.russian (T) (C) (E) 15:54, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete if it cannot be proven he is a real noble, and that he has some notability other than a famous surname. Lankiveil 11:13, 20 March 2006 (UTC).
- Delete nn. --Terence Ong 11:12, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as completely non-notable. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 11:52, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete next time use WP:PROD Computerjoe's talk 16:39, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom Nigelthefish 18:54, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
