Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Constantine Conspiracy/Archive
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Constantine Conspiracy
Has the term ‘Constantine Conspiracy’ been used by others to refer to these actions by Emperor Constantine? If not, what did they refer to it as? What objection would you have to putting the material about the “authority” of the Gospel of Matthew (original) under the article Gospel of the Hebrews, if it is not already there? It seems to me that an article on conspiracy should focus on the conspiracy. I think that that would make a much better article. Bejnar 17:58, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- Yes it has been used by others e.g. "The Constantine Conspiracy: Another remarkable claim in The Da Vinci Code is that the Bible, as we know it today, was collated by the pagan Roman Emperor Constantine the Great, (231). Brown lifted this idea straight from Holy Blood, Holy Grail: It was at this point that most of the crucial alterations in the New Testament were probably made and Jesus assumed the unique status he has enjoyed ever since. The importance of Constantine’s commission must not be underestimated.7"
-
- The material I cited has one central theme < The Pagan Roman Emperor Constantine the Great, wanted to change the "Jewish group" who used The Gospel of the Hebrews , into modern Christianity based on the Four Gospels.> Thus my article probably needs to be expanded, not merged. Since the Da Vinci Code this has become a hot topic! I would wait for a cooling down period !
--MeBee 04:28, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
