Talk:Azeztulite
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Azeztulite is part of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Gemstones, Jewelry, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Article Grading: This article REALLY needs cleanup. Right now it reads as a POV against gems in religion (as much as I agree with the POV). SauliH 16:55, 30 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, gemstones subpage. | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, Culture and Society subpage. | ||
|
WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry To-do:
|
|||
[edit] Merger with Quartz
Actually, I think it's ok to leave it as a separate page dealing only with the new age mumbo-jumbo/scam. I have just classified it solely in the category Category:Quackery to reflect that. The page could use some editing in particular the first sentence had me a bit confused. Pascal.Tesson 05:48, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
I agree, it should be kept as a separate category. There is a long list of fake, forged and treated minerals - Azeztulite and Aqua Aura are just the start of a long list. Also, there is a fine line between enhancement of minerals/gemstone and downright forgeries. For example all the citrine sold in mineral shops is fake, its heat-treated amethyst; heating causes purple amethyst to turn yellow. Whereas ruby and sapphire can be heat treated to improve their transparency, this is not forgery but enhancement. Diamond Dave 18/09/2006 15:32
- Fair enough! But let me suggest again that it might then be appropriate to start the fake mineral article (with due references) so that the whole status of Azeztulite is clerer. Pascal.Tesson 14:40, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
